FAQ
-
Applicants register and log in using national electronic ID solutions (such as BankID, MitID, or FTN where applicable). Secure identification is required to initiate and submit an application.
-
One researcher initiates the application in the portal and may involve other researchers as collaborators. The accredited Nordic university acts as the formal applicant and host institution.
-
The application does not meet the formal eligibility or scope requirements defined in the call. Eligibility screening is administrative and does not involve scientific assessment.
-
Any researcher who has completed a PhD may serve as Principal Investigator. There are no formal requirements regarding seniority, tenure, or career stage.
-
Applicants should briefly describe how research results will be communicated and shared, including dissemination, engagement, and use of results, in line with open research principles.
-
User or stakeholder involvement should be described where relevant in the proposal, typically under impact, communication, or implementation, and justified by the nature of the basic research.
-
The institutional justification is provided through the required commitment letter from the host university and reflected in the proposal’s alignment with the Foundation’s purpose and priorities.
-
No. The DNV Foundation is an independent private foundation. Funded projects must nevertheless meet high standards of transparency, accountability, and responsible use of funds.
-
Any researcher may initiate an application, but an accredited Nordic university must be the formal applicant and host institution for funded projects.
-
Yes, they may participate if included by an eligible university and if their contribution strengthens the scientific quality of the project.
-
Yes. The call defines both minimum and maximum grant amounts to ensure projects are of sufficient scale and ambition.
-
Projects may run for up to three years from the official project start date.
-
No. Co‑funding is optional and does not affect eligibility or evaluation.
-
No. Projects are either funded at the requested amount or not funded.
-
Yes. A limited proportion of funding is withheld and released after approval of final scientific and financial reports.
-
Yes, provided there is no overlap in funded activities or costs and the Foundation’s contribution is clearly justified.
-
Reasonable and justified indirect costs are eligible, in line with the host institution’s cost model and transparency requirements.
-
Yes. Host institutions must maintain auditable accounts, and the Foundation may request additional financial checks where necessary.
-
Final reporting includes a scientific report, certified financial accounts, and documentation of open dissemination of results.
-
Yes. Applicants receive written, criteria‑based feedback based on expert and panel assessments.
-
No. Individual reviewers remain anonymous, but the names of panels or committees may be published.
-
Applications follow a three‑stage process: administrative screening, independent scientific review, and strategic decision by the Research Funding Committee.
-
Excellence, impact, implementation, and alignment with the Foundation’s purpose are used and weighted equally.
-
Yes, where appropriate for hypothesis‑driven research. Alternatives must be explained for other research types.
-
Openness is the default. Data and code should be shared unless restrictions are clearly justified.
-
Restrictions are allowed for legal, ethical, security, privacy, or dual‑use reasons and must be proportionate and documented.
-
Intellectual property is owned by the host institution or employer, not by the DNV Foundation.
-
No. The Foundation does not claim ownership or commercial rights to research results.
-
They are handled by the host institution under national procedures, with the Foundation informed and able to impose proportionate measures.
-
Through a risk‑based approach following the principle “as open as possible, as restricted as necessary”.
-
No. The funding is designed to support deep, discipline‑based basic research.
-
No. Proposals must be assessable ex ante based on excellence, impact, and feasibility.
-
No. Collaboration is optional and neither required nor prioritized.